logo

Is my attractiveness score too high, too low, or about right?

Posted 1 years ago by
1644

Poll

Too high
87%
Too low
About Right
13%
15 votes

Replies

Way too high. Your a decent looking dude like I've mentioned before but photo feeler is such bs.
Replied by washay6674 · a· 1744 · 1 years ago
Photofeeler is possibly the best place for seeing how you attractive you are, or at least how attractive you are in your picture you're using. Does it use objective beauty standards like TRM? No but that's the point. Beauty is almost entirely dependant on the viewpoint of others, not some made up rating guide where you'll get banned if you give your own opinion. Also take into account the rating system on Photofeeler is much different. For example it clearly says that his score would equate to top 10% of people, so that means he's better than 9 out of every 10 people on the website, which seems pretty believable.
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
Yeah Photofeeler is def one of the better rating sites I've encountered. What's great is that it actually calculates how each person votes and so there isn't much bias or underrating. I'm not a big fan oF TRM. I got banned for saying someone was a 7 when apparently they were only a 5 something. And the guide doesn't give very clear instructions other than "this person is slightly above average, this person is model terriroty" etc. So kind of hard to rate when it doesn't even clearly say how. And then there's thpse pages like am I hot and rate me where on every post no matter how ugly the person is "omg you're sooo hot I wish I look l jsut like you" and a bunch of guys putting the eggplant and water emojis
Replied by randyjones123 · a· 655 · 1 years ago
I'd say in this pic it's about right. You're def really good looking here
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
[deleted]
I think the issue is Photofeeler uses different metrics than other rating systems. So let's you consider a 9 to be 1 in every 1,000 people. In that case the ratings will seem inflated because it doesn't match up to what you personally consider to be a 9. But if you pay attention to Photofeeler's percentages for each of the ratings, than it really does make sense and lines up pretty accurately for how attractive a particular individual is. Like Randy scored 9.1 which the website says would land him in the top 10% and I think that's definitely accurate. Based on this pic he's easily better looking thwn 90 percent of the dudes I see on a daily basis. I've uploaded a ton of people to Pf and their rating on there is usually pretty relevant to their attractivness level. For example compare the scores of Kendall Jenner to this dude and you can see it does give a pretty good indication as to what people find attractive
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
Also I think the scores on here tend to be too low sometimes. Like I posted a pic of Chris Pratt and he scored mainly a 7 which is def too low for him, and would mean hes on the same level as all the average or slightly above average dude on here who score around a 7.
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
Chris Pratt is nothing speacial tho. Ive seen at least 20 guys at my high school are are cuter
Replied by bethany123 · a· 299 · 1 years ago
Lol the guys you like are just weird looking emo dudes. Chris Pratt destroys all of them in a instance
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago
[deleted]
Ok yeah I get what you're saying. Basically we're rating them for how attractive they are according to famous people and not everyone who posts here. But the thing is the scale on here has clear definitions for each rating and so it doesn't really make for someone like Chris Pratt to score 7 when it says its just merely above average, where he should be scoring at least 9 which is model territory. If we were using a different scale exclusively for celebrites than his score would maybe make more sense, but since we're using a scale meant to be assessed and compared to the general population his score his too low for him.
Replied by 1rate_people_account · a· 1730 · 1 years ago

Recommended for you

Rate me
Posted by Mohamad_bourji· 3 · 1 years ago
Rate
Posted by just.ague· 35 · 1 years ago
Rate me!
Posted by Mohamad_bourji· 3 · 1 years ago
Fr
Posted by Okokokleo· 12 · 1 years ago
Rate
Posted by Fairululu· 173 · 1 years ago
Rate
Posted by Rowanzz9584567· 634 · 1 years ago
Rate me
Posted by Elizabeth24· 21 · 1 years ago
Loading...